This
article was dense indeed but helped me understand what was happening when I was
attempting research in other classes. When it comes to research there always
seems to be the point in the research process where I am not quite finding what
I need in order to support my work. I will have all of the information that
will help support my topic and then I will find new information that will
contradict it. It is very frustrating to fall, "in the dip," and
sometimes I have down right just started over and found a new focus.
The
principle of uncertainty played a part in that it hindered my ability to be
more effective at finding consistent information. In the past, the redundancy
and the mood corollary have been at fault in my research process. Sometimes my
mood has been too narrow causing me to gather very little information in the
beginning. As a result, the information lacks redundancy itself and I start to
wonder if I am if I am on the right path in my research. If I get stuck, then
most likely I am in the zone of intervention where I can ask for assistant with
an issue and it will be beneficial to me in making forward progress. During
times of uncertainty, I usually seek out some form of assistance to help
refocus me and guide me back to the right path. I am not sure if I would do a
whole lot different in my research process. I feel that I am aware of what
hinders me in this process and am open to seeking out avenues that help with alleviate
them.
Hi Amanda, I'm glad you found the article worthwhile, and it sounds like the ISP model matched your experience to some extent. You've done a good job describing this using the terms Kuhlthau uses. I would also like to know about a specific time that you were seeking information, and how it went for you.--Sam
ReplyDelete